While we report a median frequency of 4.0 tests per year (IQR 3.1–5.3), provincial differences were noted [4.6 (IQR 3.4–6.0) in British Columbia, 3.7 (IQR 2.8–4.7) in Ontario, and 3.7 (IQR 2.9–4.5) in Quebec; P<0.0001]. These differences in testing rates may have influenced our findings. In terms of clinical significance, the click here benefits of more rapid suppression are still being explored. However, a recent re-analysis of two past clinical trials determined that the timing of initial suppression was not a reliable predictor of long-term suppression [19]. Exploration of the potential benefits of earlier suppression in additional cohorts with extended follow-up periods would
be beneficial. Careful selection of the antiretrovirals composing a HAART regimen is critical to patient tolerance and adherence. Our findings are consistent with those of other studies in demonstrating the importance of the initial
HAART regimen in the probability and rate of achieving virological suppression buy GSK2118436 [11,12,20]. As indicated here, individuals starting on ritonavir-boosted PI regimens or NNRTI regimens were more likely to achieve suppression than patients on unboosted PI regimens. This is probably related to side-effect profiles and convenience of dosing schedules. Our finding suggesting the superior virological efficacy of efavirenz compared with nevirapine is of interest, but should be interpreted cautiously. While this finding corresponds to the results of some other cohort studies comparing these two NNRTIs [11,21–23], it contrasts with the results of the 2NN randomized trial, in which no differences in virological Selleckchem RG7420 suppression were documented after 48 weeks of therapy [24]. Indeed, our “time to” analysis may have limited our ability to compare suppression between these antiretrovirals at a specific point later in follow-up, and it is possible that the differences ceased later on. The differences could also be a result of confounding, if patients thought to be less likely to adhere were prescribed nevirapine. For example, patients with depressive symptoms are often less able to tolerate efavirenz compared with nevirapine and may
be less adherent. Preferential prescription of nevirapine to these patients may at least partially explain our findings. However, as we lack data on treatment adherence and reasons behind initial prescriptions, this cannot be ascertained. Possible cohort biases (described later in this section) may also explain our findings. Importantly, on the basis of these data, we cannot draw any specific conclusions about the relative overall efficacies of these drugs as we did not compare the probabilities of subsequent virological failure, regimen switching, or adverse events in our analyses. Individuals with lower baseline viral load measurements and those with AIDS diagnoses at baseline were more likely to achieve virological suppression.