The PCR product was cleaned of amplification primer using the QIAquick® PCR Purification selleck screening library Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Purified DNA was sequenced at Iowa State University’s DNA Facility (Ames, IA) with the sequencing primers for each gene as outlined in table 1. Sequencing was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequence data obtained was imported into DNAStar (Lasergene,

Madison, WI), trimmed and aligned to the control sequences (obtained from the MLST site) and interrogated against the MLST database. Sequence types generated were recorded and added to the strain information (see above). Strain this website analysis by Simpson’s Index of Diversity The discriminatory ability of PFGE, antimicrobial resistance profiling, and MLST analysis was calculated using the numerical index of discrimination (D) according to the method of Hunter and Gaston [37]. The discriminatory index represents the probability that two unrelated strains sampled from the test population will be placed into different typing groups [37]. Results Figure 1 shows the dendrogram analysis of all isolates (n = 98) examined in the study including PFGE profiles, MLST

sequence types and antimicrobial susceptibility data of S. Senftenberg from human and animal hosts examined in this study. Dendrogram generation was based on PFGE analysis and not weighted for ST or antimicrobial resistance data which are included in the figure. Figure 1 Dendrogram displaying PFGE profiles, antimicrobial

resistance Anlotinib profiles and sequence types (ST) of S . Senftenberg from animal and human hosts. Key CYTH4 for antimicrobial abbreviations – see table 2. PFGE analysis identified 93 profiles among the 98 isolates examined. Cluster analysis primarily divided the isolates into four main clusters at approximately 58% similarity. The upper cluster (cluster 1) consisted primarily of porcine, bovine and equine isolates; these were subtyped as ST 14. Cluster 2, the largest cluster, consisted of animal and human isolates and all but one were ST 14. Cluster 3 contained primarily porcine isolates of ST 14; isolates in this cluster also had the highest rates of antimicrobial resistance with most displaying resistance to approximately 10 antimicrobials. Cluster 4 was composed of human and animal isolates (including the sequenced strain) and were all identified as ST 185. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis (Table 2) found that all of the human isolates tested were susceptible to all 15 antimicrobial agents.