The median (range) gestation at delivery was 40 (27–42) weeks and the median (range) birthweight was 3.1 (1.2–4.5) kg. There were no HIV-positive infants. Antepartum and postpartum LPV and RTV pharmacokinetic data from 46 patients are summarized in Table 2. Geometric mean (95% CI) total LPV concentrations were comparable during the first, second [3525 (2823–4227) ng/mL] and third trimesters [3346 (2813–3880) ng/mL; P=0.910], but were ∼35% lower relative to LPV

concentrations selleck compound observed during the postpartum period [5136 (3693–6579) ng/mL; P=0.006; all comparisons]. Equally, RTV Ctrough values were significantly reduced antepartum vs. postpartum (P=0.017; all comparisons). Inter-subject variation in LPV Ctrough was moderately high both antepartum (24–45%) and postpartum (44%). The time of post-dose sampling was consistent across the trimesters of pregnancy and postpartum, at approximately 13 h (P=0.924). Overall, six of 46 patients (13%)

had LPV concentrations below the proposed MEC (<1000 ng/mL) in pregnancy; one patient (8%) in the second trimester and five patients (12%) in the third trimester (LPV=<73–831 ng/mL; 14.5–26 h post-dose); all were receiving standard dosing of the LPV/r tablet at baseline. All 12 patients at postpartum had plasma concentrations in excess of the LPV MEC. A single patient below target in the second trimester (LPV Ctrough=790ng/mL; 29 weeks; 15 h post-dose) was dose-adjusted to three tablets (600/150 mg) twice daily at 32 weeks which achieved above-target check details concentrations (LPV=4575 ng/mL; 34 weeks; 12.7 h). She was later reduced back to two tablets twice daily post-delivery and remained therapeutic at 6 weeks postpartum. Of the five patients below target in the third trimester, one patient had an LPV Ctrough of 831 ng/mL (32 weeks; 17 h post-dose); no changes were made to the LPV/r dose, and she underwent no further TDM sampling having

Cytidine deaminase delivered elsewhere. Another had an LPV Ctrough of 647 ng/mL (26 weeks; 15.7 h post-dose). No dose adjustments were made and an additional TDM was performed at 32 weeks, in which she remained below target (641 ng/mL). Both patients discontinued ART post-delivery. The remaining three patients had LPV concentrations below our predefined cut-off for adherence (<384 ng/mL) and were therefore excluded from subsequent statistical analyses. These subjects were suspected by the study personnel as being nonadherent to treatment with one patient admitting to having missed doses one day. In two instances the time of pharmacokinetic sampling was greater than 20 h and this may also have contributed to the low LPV concentrations observed. Of the six patients who were below the MEC during pregnancy, five had undetectable pVL (<50 copies/mL) at the time of TDM sampling. The remaining subject had a pVL of 209 copies/ml in the third trimester. LPV unbound trough concentrations (Table 2) were lower in the first, second and third trimesters relative to postpartum (P=0.