The defect formation enthalpies of the copper vacancy in CuInS2 and CuGaS2

selleck chemicals are around 0.8 eV higher than in CulnSe(2) and CuGaSe2. This results in the absence of Fermi-level pinning for CuInS2 and explains a reduced tendency of CuInS2 and CuGaS2 to form ordered defect compounds. The calculated migration barrier of the copper vacancy in CuInSe2 is 1.26 eV and of comparable magnitude for CuGaSe2, CuInS2, and CuGaS2. From this data we estimate a diffusion coefficient for CuInSe2 and show that it is in agreement with measurements of diffusion in stoichiometric single crystalline samples when direct experimental methods are used. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3456161]“
“Noniatrogenic selleck screening library neonatal gastric perforation is a rare and life-threatening condition whose etiology is often unclear. Interstitial cells of Cajal act as gastrointestinal pacemaker cells and express the proto-oncogene c-Kit. Six new cases were identified at our institution which presented with no mechanical, pharmacologic, or otherwise medical-related intervention prior to rupture. The number of interstitial cells of Cajal in nonnecrotic muscularis propria from five random high-power fields per specimen was compared using immunohistochemical stains for c-Kit. The authors show that a lack of interstitial cells of Cajal

in the stomach musculature may be implicated in the development of noniatrogenic gastric perforation (p = 0.008). Further large-scale studies, including molecular and genetic analysis, may help to better understand this phenomenon.”
“Aims: To determine whether a new palpometer and manual click here palpation can detect site-to-site differences in human craniofacial pain sensitivity in a similar pattern to that of an electronic pressure algometer and subsequently to compare between-session and within-session variability of palpometer and manual palpation. Methods: Sixteen volunteers participated. Experiment 1 was carried out in two sessions. In session

1, pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were determined with a pressure algometer at nine craniofacial sites. Manual palpation and the palpometer were then applied to all sites, and subjects scored perceived pressure/pain on a 0 to 100 numerical rating scale (NRS). Mean scores were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Ten of the volunteers were recalled for a second session and the same protocol was carried out except for assessment of PPTs to establish between-session variability. In experiment 2, three craniofacial sites were examined using the palpometer and manual palpation. Both techniques were repeated 10 times at each site and coefficient of variation (CV) was compared to determine within-session variability.