Table 3 shows the adverse reactions in detail. Table 2 Statistical Analysis of Therapeutic Response and Prognosis in the Two Groups Experimental group (cases) Control group (cases)
p value Chemotherapy response CR 2 1 <0.05 PR 11 5 SD 2 10 Surgical margin Negative 13 6 <0.01 Positive 2 10 Progression free survival Yes 10 4 <0.05 No 5 12 Table 3 Adverse Events of Chemotherapy in the Two Groups AE Grade (CTCAEv3.0) Experimental group (cases) Control group (cases) p value Nausea 1 (mild) 9 10 >0.05 2 (moderate) 4 5 Vomiting 1 (mild) 5 7 >0.05 2 (moderate) 1 1 Asthenia 1 (mild) 6 4 >0.05 2 (moderate) 0 0 Granulocytopenia Obeticholic chemical structure 1 (mild) 7 8 >0.05 2 (moderate) 2 0 Anaemia 1 (mild) 2 1 >0.05 2 (moderate) 0 0 Peripheral Neuropathy 1 (mild) 12 0 Not Comparable 2 (moderate) 3 0 Figure 1 Image of Typical CR Case. A. Tumor Daporinad manufacturer before chemotherapy. B. Lung metastasis before chemotherapy. C. Tumor after chemotherapy. D. No mass in lung after chemotherapy. At the median follow-up of 24 months, 10 patients were tumor free, sarcoma had relapsed in 4 patients and 1 patient had died in the experimental group. see more The only death occurred in a patient who did not respond to the chemotherapy and had metastases in both lungs before surgery. In the control group, 4 patients were tumor
free, sarcoma persisted in 10 patients, and 2 patients had died. Of the two deaths in the control group, one was found to be with lung metastasis before surgery and died 13 months after operation, the other one suffered
from lung metastasis 3 months after operation and died 15 months after operation. The difference of progression free survival between the two groups was significant (χ2 = 5.427, p < 0.05; Table 2). Limb functions were essentially normal in all the 28 patients who survived. Median progression-free survival was significantly higher in the experimental group (21 months) compared to the control group (19 months; Z = 4.44, p < 0.05; Figure 2). Until the end of the follow-up, the difference in overall survival between the two groups was not significant (Z = 0.28, p Sinomenine > 0.05; Figure 3). Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier chart for PFS. Progression free survival curve showed that PFS of study group was superior to that of control group. “”Censored”" means cases without endpoint event at the end of follow-up. Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier chart for OS. Survival curve showed that the difference of OS between the two groups was not significant. “”Censored”" means cases without endpoint event at the end of follow-up. Pearson’s multivariate correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between progression free survival (PFS), chemotherapy regimens, chemotherapeutic response, and surgical margin.