Moreover, we expect phosphenes to be largely limited to this area unless electrode implantation extends to the medial primary and secondary visual cortices (Srivastava et al., 2007). Techniques such as head scanning will likely be necessary to optimize the functionality of future cortical prosthesis implants, and will therefore need to be incorporated into prosthesis assessment procedures PLX4032 molecular weight (Cha et al., 1992b, Cha et al., 1992c and Chen et al., 2006). The types of vision assessment tasks most appropriate for cortical prosthetic vision may also depend on the method of image processing employed in the system design. For example, system designs

utilizing the aforementioned intensity-based image processing techniques vs. those employing a machine vision type of symbolic image GSK-3 beta pathway representation may

dictate a radically different approach to prosthetic vision assessment. In summary, functional measures will form a central component of any post-implant assessment regimen, however regulatory authorities focus more on tests of visual acuity as measures of functional success (Dagnelie, 2008). This may only change with a concerted effort by visual prosthesis researchers to develop a framework for standard testing paradigms appropriate to prosthetic vision (Rizzo and Ayton, 2014). One of the key obstacles to developing a cortical visual prosthesis is the observed deterioration of the interface between the electrode and brain tissue. Studies of implanted electrodes for both neural recording and cortical stimulation show highly variable patterns of stability over time (Polikov et al., 2005). In some cases electrodes may simply fail to function Resveratrol after implantation (Torab et al., 2011), or failure manifests gradually over a period of months to years as a loss of recording capability

(Hochberg et al., 2012 and Rousche and Normann, 1998) or increases in stimulation threshold currents to excessive levels (Davis et al., 2012). The implications of this loss of electrode performance may depend on the application. For example, in the case of a motor neuroprosthesis, loss of signals from some electrodes may not grossly impair system functioning as demonstrated by the successful operation of a robotic arm and hand by a tetraplegic volunteer with a neural recording array implanted 5 years prior (Hochberg et al., 2012). As described previously, a loss of the ability to elicit phosphenes from some electrodes may require advanced image processing algorithms to maximize the utility of remaining phosphenes. However, there will undoubtedly be a threshold below which implant functionality deteriorates to the point that neither software nor behavioral changes can compensate. Thus regardless of the application, long-term efficacy of a neural prosthesis is predicated largely on the electrode/tissue interface remaining viable.