However, altogether these results indicate that YFP-MinDEc likely recognizes the same lipid spirals as GFP-MinDBs (Barák et al., 2008). Although no apparent phenotypical effect of MinEEc expression on B. subtilis cells was observed, its localization was also inspected. The fluorescence signal was dispersed through the cytoplasm. Only a few spots near cell poles were visible, which can be caused by inclusion body formation (not shown). However, the immunoblot analysis revealed only minimal degradation of the fusion protein (Fig. 3c). These data indicate that MinEEc-GFP

is probably unable to co-operate with B. subtilis Min proteins. To further study MinDEc functioning in B. subtilis, find more we also examined three previously undescribed mutant forms possessing mutations in different parts of the molecule (G209D, S89P and I23N). The cell lengths were measured in B. subtilis strains IB1135, IB1136 and IB1137, which express GFP-MinDEc(G209D), GFP-MinDEc(S89P)

and GFP-MinDEc(I23N), respectively, from the amyE locus under the control of Pxyl. The ability of mutant versions of MinDEc to substitute MinDBs in ΔminD cells and their localization pattern was tested as above for the GFP-MinDEc. Interestingly, one of these mutants, GFP-MinDEc(G209D), showed different effects on B. subtilis selleck chemical cells in comparison with GFP-MinDEc. This protein was not able to elongate wild-type B. subtilis cells. Moreover, it did not suppress the minicell phenotype of ΔminDBs cells at a lower concentration as was shown for the nonmutated version of GFP-MinDEc (Table 2). However, the GFP-MinDEc(G209D) fluorescence pattern was not perturbed and resembled YFP-MinDEc localization (Fig. this website 4c). Despite the homology between Min proteins in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, two different paths of their action have been observed and thus two models have been proposed. In E. coli the Min system behaves extremely dynamically. An oscillatory movement of the Min proteins on helical trajectories was described (Shih et al., 2003, 2005). By contrast, in B. subtilis a static localization

of Min proteins at the division sites and at the cell poles was observed (Edwards & Errington, 1997; Marston et al., 1998). We have recently shown that GFP-MinDBs, attracted to negatively charged phospholipids, localizes to the membrane in helical structures (Barák et al., 2008). In this study the functioning and localization of E. coli Min proteins in B. subtilis cells was determined. MinCEc and also YFP-MinDEc cause elongation of B. subtilis cells, indicating that they are functional and are able to cause division delay or to block the cell division. However, MinCEc was not able to repair defects caused by minCBs disruption. In this case we are not able to exclude the possibility of a negative effect of minCBs deletion on expression of minDBs.