Although disease enhancement after vaccination has been identified for some other diseases the negative vaccine effectiveness for the Shamir vaccine is probably an artefact (residual age-confounding and collinearity). The confidence intervals show the uncertainty in the modelled Shamir VE. It could be argued that outbreaks are cases of vaccine failure that do not represent typical vaccine performance. If so, vaccine effectiveness estimates

would be pessimistic. That said, findings were consistent with (a) vaccine matching r1-values which suggested a good match for the homologous TUR 11 vaccine and a poor match for the Shamir vaccine (see Section 2) and (b) the large number of outbreaks seen within the Turkish vaccination programme. VE for the TUR 11 vaccine is comparable with the 60%–85% vaccine selleck chemicals JNJ-26481585 clinical trial efficacy that would

be expected for a 3PD50 vaccine [14] and is close to OIE batch release requirements where >70%–75% of vaccinated cattle must have a protective titre [13]. When comparing the Shamir and TUR 11 vaccines, differences in VE are consistent with differences in vaccine match r1-values. The closest we had to a direct comparison of the two vaccines was in Afyon-1 where 11 doses of Shamir vaccine were used in one village whilst TUR 11 vaccine was used in the other investigated village. The TUR 11 vaccine was approximately twice as effective with 3/11 (27%) affected in cattle vaccinated with the Shamir vaccine and 11/80 (14%) in the TUR 11 vaccinated cattle Oxymatrine (see Table 2), however, this comparison was under-powered. TUR 11 vaccine performance varied, possibly due to variability in (1) field conditions, e.g. season, time since vaccination, coverage, husbandry, body condition, nutrition and other animal factors; (2) vaccine potency at point of production; or (3) vaccine delivery (e.g. cold chain or shelf life adherence). The reduction in VE with increasing time since vaccination was as expected, with protection due to the TUR 11 vaccine declining after 100 days. The Shamir VE

appeared to decline sooner (after 50 days) (Table 2). The findings differ to those from a PD50 challenge study. A high potency (>6PD50) Shamir vaccine held in the EU vaccine bank protected against clinical FMD when challenged with the Turkish FMD Asia-1 Sindh-08 field virus [15]. Differences in protection will partly reflect differences in potency as poor vaccine match may be overcome if high potency vaccines are used [16] and in the challenge study the vaccine used was likely to be much greater than 6PD50. Furthermore, in the challenge study, animals were assessed at time of peak immunity (21 days after vaccination), whereas in the VE study time between vaccination and challenge varied from one to five months. NSP serology is a sensitive method of detecting animals with significant systemic viral replication [17]. As this will correlate with virus shedding, NSP status is a suitable outcome for vaccine evaluation.