(C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Objective: To examine the external validity of the United Kingdom English version of the LittlEARS (R) Auditory Questionnaire with English-speaking families of Canadian children with normal hearing.
Methods: The United Kingdom English version of the LittlEARS was administered to English-speaking families of 130 children with normal hearing in Ontario, Canada. Total scores for these children were compared to German-derived normative values.
Results: There was no significant difference between Canadian and German norms when
using the United Kingdom English version of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire.
Conclusions: The United Kingdom English version of Screening Library mw the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire is appropriate for use with English-speaking families of normal hearing Canadian children. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Objectives: To evaluate the comparability of the test outcome or the acceptability of the outcome bias regarding the 2 modes of click here sample aspiration offered by the Olympus AU2700 automatic biochemical analyzer and to determine whether calibration and internal quality control are required when using the sample aspiration mode for a statistics (STAT) table.
Methods: Per the procedures outlined in the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards EP9-A2 protocol,
16 tests were performed for analytes such as alanine aminotransferase, total protein, and urea to evaluate and compare the outcome bias between the mode used with racks and that used with the STAT table. Forty serologic samples were tested.
Results: Among the results of the 16 tests, almost all levels of selleck chemicals outcome bias were acceptable. The sole exception was that regarding the TG test, in which system error reached 6.89%; this amount exceeds the 6.25% allowable percentage of error at lower concentrations.
Conclusion: Based on these data, we conclude that calibration and internal quality control are unnecessary when using the sample aspiration
mode of the STAT table.”
“OBJECTIVES: Opportunities to treat multifocal lung cancers, mostly adenocarcinoma, are increasing due to the development of imaging technologies. The optimal therapy modality to treat multifocally growing lung cancers remains obscure. To determine the features of multifocal lung cancers, we retrospectively reviewed patients with multiple lung lesions.
METHODS: Clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of 31 patients with multifocal lesions were compared with those of patients who had had radical lung resection for solitary lung cancer. Gene mutation analyses for EGFR, KRAS and P53 were performed on three tumours of each of the patients who had four or more lesions.
RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 17 had double tumours, 4 had triple tumours and 10 had 4 or more lesions. Patients with four or more lesions were significantly more likely to be females and never smokers.