4 and Fig. 5). For example, straw retention improves soil moisture conditions by improving soil structure and reduces soil water evaporation, thus benefiting

crop growth under dry conditions [19]; however, straw retention in areas with high rainfall may lower crop yield owing to waterlogging [35]. Similar results were found by Li et al. [38] and De Vita et al. [44], who reported significantly higher wheat yield under straw retention than under CT only in dry years. Thus, in our study, straw retention significantly increased crop yield in low-precipitation areas (Northwest China). In areas or seasons with high temperature, straw retention can reduce soil selleck inhibitor temperature and its variation, benefiting crop production [45]. EPZ-6438 cost Furthermore, high temperature can promote straw decomposition and nutrient release, thereby alleviating microbial nutrient immobilization [46]. However, in areas or seasons with low temperature, straw retention may cause poor germination and delay crop growth by preventing soil warming [11] and [47]. A study has shown low nutrient availability under straw retention due to slow nutrient mineralization at cold soil temperatures [48]. Thus, straw retention enhanced crop yield in South China as compared to CT, whereas no

significant effects were found in North and Northeast China. Straw retention significantly increased maize yield compared to CT, with no significant effect for wheat (Fig. 5). Straw retention may cause poor germination of winter wheat and delay crop growth [41] and [47]. Chen et al. [41] reported that lower soil temperature under straw retention in spring delayed the development of winter wheat up to 7 days, on average reducing final grain yield by 7% compared to treatments without straw retention over five seasons.

In contrast, cooler soil temperatures and greater soil water content under straw retention are likely to be beneficial for the growth of summer maize [49]. In agreement with the previous studies, the size of effect of CA on crop yield increased with experimental duration [19] and [34]. Based on many long-term field experiments, Farooq et al. [7] also showed that crop yield produced with CA improved over time relative to CT. These relative yield aminophylline increases over time have been attributed to improved soil conditions under residue retention, such as organic carbon, soil enzyme activity, microbial biomass, porosity and structural stability [7] and [10]. However, Kirkegaard [42] reported no significant yield differences between CA practices and CT and even a declining trend under CA over time, owing mainly to the failure to control weeds and diseases. Thus, long-term impacts of CA on crop yield may depend on the balance between the positive effects of soil fertility improvement and the negative effects of aggravating weed and disease stresses.